GHSA-V2VH-P96V-7CC2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 15:31 – Updated: 2026-05-08 15:31
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/slab: do not access current->mems_allowed_seq if !allow_spin

Lockdep complains when get_from_any_partial() is called in an NMI context, because current->mems_allowed_seq is seqcount_spinlock_t and not NMI-safe:

================================ WARNING: inconsistent lock state 6.19.0-rc5-kfree-rcu+ #315 Tainted: G N


inconsistent {INITIAL USE} -> {IN-NMI} usage. kunit_try_catch/9989 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes: ffff889085799820 (&_s->seqcount#3){.-.-}-{0:0}, at: slab_alloc+0x58f/0xc00 {INITIAL USE} state was registered at: lock_acquire+0x185/0x320 kernel_init_freeable+0x391/0x1150 kernel_init+0x1f/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x736/0x8f0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 irq event stamp: 56 hardirqs last enabled at (55): [] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x70 hardirqs last disabled at (56): [] __schedule+0x2a8a/0x6630 softirqs last enabled at (0): [] copy_process+0x1dc1/0x6a10 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0

other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario:

     CPU0
     ----
lock(&____s->seqcount#3);
<Interrupt>
  lock(&____s->seqcount#3);

*** DEADLOCK ***

According to Documentation/locking/seqlock.rst, seqcount_t is not NMI-safe and seqcount_latch_t should be used when read path can interrupt the write-side critical section. In this case, do not access current->mems_allowed_seq and avoid retry.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-43285"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-08T14:16:35Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/slab: do not access current-\u003emems_allowed_seq if !allow_spin\n\nLockdep complains when get_from_any_partial() is called in an NMI\ncontext, because current-\u003emems_allowed_seq is seqcount_spinlock_t and\nnot NMI-safe:\n\n  ================================\n  WARNING: inconsistent lock state\n  6.19.0-rc5-kfree-rcu+ #315 Tainted: G                 N\n  --------------------------------\n  inconsistent {INITIAL USE} -\u003e {IN-NMI} usage.\n  kunit_try_catch/9989 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:\n  ffff889085799820 (\u0026____s-\u003eseqcount#3){.-.-}-{0:0}, at: ___slab_alloc+0x58f/0xc00\n  {INITIAL USE} state was registered at:\n    lock_acquire+0x185/0x320\n    kernel_init_freeable+0x391/0x1150\n    kernel_init+0x1f/0x220\n    ret_from_fork+0x736/0x8f0\n    ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n  irq event stamp: 56\n  hardirqs last  enabled at (55): [\u003cffffffff850a68d7\u003e] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x70\n  hardirqs last disabled at (56): [\u003cffffffff850858ca\u003e] __schedule+0x2a8a/0x6630\n  softirqs last  enabled at (0): [\u003cffffffff81536711\u003e] copy_process+0x1dc1/0x6a10\n  softirqs last disabled at (0): [\u003c0000000000000000\u003e] 0x0\n\n  other info that might help us debug this:\n   Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n         CPU0\n         ----\n    lock(\u0026____s-\u003eseqcount#3);\n    \u003cInterrupt\u003e\n      lock(\u0026____s-\u003eseqcount#3);\n\n   *** DEADLOCK ***\n\nAccording to Documentation/locking/seqlock.rst, seqcount_t is not\nNMI-safe and seqcount_latch_t should be used when read path can interrupt\nthe write-side critical section. In this case, do not access\ncurrent-\u003emems_allowed_seq and avoid retry.",
  "id": "GHSA-v2vh-p96v-7cc2",
  "modified": "2026-05-08T15:31:22Z",
  "published": "2026-05-08T15:31:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43285"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/144080a5823b2dbd635acb6decf7ab23182664f3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/353dd9934447b9193643ae1afd938607a74d4915"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/efd767ddcef0669bbd33c6a823ea0a88f06d4b29"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…