ghsa-rxj2-pmxv-j3x6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:10
Modified
2025-04-11 03:59
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Integer overflow in the ordered_malloc function in boost/pool/pool.hpp in Boost Pool before 3.9 makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to perform memory-related attacks such as buffer overflows via a large memory chunk size value, which causes less memory to be allocated than expected.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-2677"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-07-25T19:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Integer overflow in the ordered_malloc function in boost/pool/pool.hpp in Boost Pool before 3.9 makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to perform memory-related attacks such as buffer overflows via a large memory chunk size value, which causes less memory to be allocated than expected.",
"id": "GHSA-rxj2-pmxv-j3x6",
"modified": "2025-04-11T03:59:46Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:10:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2677"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202105-04"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/78326"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6701"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://kqueue.org/blog/2012/03/05/memory-allocator-security-revisited"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-July/083416.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-June/082977.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:065"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/06/05/1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/06/07/13"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…