ghsa-rw5m-g76h-ww34
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 18:20
Modified
2022-05-01 18:20
Details
The NFSv4 ID mapper (nfsidmap) before 0.17 does not properly handle return values from the getpwnam_r function when performing a username lookup, which can cause it to report a file as being owned by "root" instead of "nobody" if the file exists on the server but not on the client.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2007-4135" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2007-09-05T01:17:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The NFSv4 ID mapper (nfsidmap) before 0.17 does not properly handle return values from the getpwnam_r function when performing a username lookup, which can cause it to report a file as being owned by \"root\" instead of \"nobody\" if the file exists on the server but not on the client.", "id": "GHSA-rw5m-g76h-ww34", "modified": "2022-05-01T18:20:39Z", "published": "2022-05-01T18:20:39Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-4135" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/36396" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9864" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/45825" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/26674" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/27043" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2007:240" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2007_18_sr.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2007-0951.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26767" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.