ghsa-rvxj-mg82-9qp8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 02:20
Modified
2025-04-03 04:20
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Stack-based buffer overflow in the IMAP service (meimaps.exe) of MailEnable Professional 1.6 and earlier and Enterprise 1.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long mailbox name in the (1) select, (2) create, (3) delete, (4) rename, (5) subscribe, or (6) unsubscribe commands.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2005-3690" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2005-11-19T01:03:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in the IMAP service (meimaps.exe) of MailEnable Professional 1.6 and earlier and Enterprise 1.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long mailbox name in the (1) select, (2) create, (3) delete, (4) rename, (5) subscribe, or (6) unsubscribe commands.", "id": "GHSA-rvxj-mg82-9qp8", "modified": "2025-04-03T04:20:04Z", "published": "2022-05-01T02:20:10Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-3690" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/23110" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2005-11/0581.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/17633" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2005-59/advisory" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1015239" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mailenable.com/hotfix" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/20929" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15492" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2005/2484" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…