ghsa-rrrm-qjm4-v8hf
Vulnerability from github
Impact
What kind of vulnerability is it?
Denial of service.
The regular expression block.def may cause catastrophic backtracking against some strings.
PoC is the following.
```javascript import * as marked from "marked";
marked.parse([x]:${' '.repeat(1500)}x ${' '.repeat(1500)} x);
```
Who is impacted?
Anyone who runs untrusted markdown through marked and does not use a worker with a time limit.
Patches
Has the problem been patched?
Yes
What versions should users upgrade to?
4.0.10
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
Do not run untrusted markdown through marked or run marked on a worker thread and set a reasonable time limit to prevent draining resources.
References
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
- https://marked.js.org/using_advanced#workers
- https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Regular_expression_Denial_of_Service_-_ReDoS
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open an issue in marked
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "marked"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.0.10"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-21680"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1333",
"CWE-400"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-01-14T19:56:20Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-01-14T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\n_What kind of vulnerability is it?_\n\nDenial of service.\n\nThe regular expression `block.def` may cause catastrophic backtracking against some strings.\nPoC is the following.\n\n```javascript\nimport * as marked from \"marked\";\n\nmarked.parse(`[x]:${\u0027 \u0027.repeat(1500)}x ${\u0027 \u0027.repeat(1500)} x`);\n```\n\n_Who is impacted?_\n\nAnyone who runs untrusted markdown through marked and does not use a worker with a time limit.\n\n### Patches\n\n_Has the problem been patched?_\n\nYes\n\n_What versions should users upgrade to?_\n\n4.0.10\n\n### Workarounds\n\n_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_\n\nDo not run untrusted markdown through marked or run marked on a [worker](https://marked.js.org/using_advanced#workers) thread and set a reasonable time limit to prevent draining resources.\n\n### References\n\n_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_\n\n- https://marked.js.org/using_advanced#workers\n- https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Regular_expression_Denial_of_Service_-_ReDoS\n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\n* Open an issue in [marked](https://github.com/markedjs/marked)\n",
"id": "GHSA-rrrm-qjm4-v8hf",
"modified": "2022-01-14T19:56:20Z",
"published": "2022-01-14T21:04:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/markedjs/marked/security/advisories/GHSA-rrrm-qjm4-v8hf"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-21680"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/markedjs/marked/commit/c4a3ccd344b6929afa8a1d50ac54a721e57012c0"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/markedjs/marked"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/markedjs/marked/releases/tag/v4.0.10"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AIXDMC3CSHYW3YWVSQOXAWLUYQHAO5UX"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in marked"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.