ghsa-rrgh-7g24-h4hg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:32
Modified
2022-05-13 01:32
Severity ?
Details
The TP-LINK EAP Controller is TP-LINK's software for remotely controlling wireless access point devices. It utilizes a Java remote method invocation (RMI) service for remote control. The RMI interface does not require any authentication before use, so it lacks user authentication for RMI service commands in EAP controller versions 2.5.3 and earlier. Remote attackers can implement deserialization attacks through the RMI protocol. Successful attacks may allow a remote attacker to remotely control the target server and execute Java functions or bytecode.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-5393" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-306" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-09-28T17:29:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "The TP-LINK EAP Controller is TP-LINK\u0027s software for remotely controlling wireless access point devices. It utilizes a Java remote method invocation (RMI) service for remote control. The RMI interface does not require any authentication before use, so it lacks user authentication for RMI service commands in EAP controller versions 2.5.3 and earlier. Remote attackers can implement deserialization attacks through the RMI protocol. Successful attacks may allow a remote attacker to remotely control the target server and execute Java functions or bytecode.", "id": "GHSA-rrgh-7g24-h4hg", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:32:12Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:32:12Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-5393" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/581311" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105402" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.