ghsa-rq5m-5v65-q84q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:47
Modified
2022-05-17 03:47
Details

Multiple off-by-one errors in the (1) MakeBigReq and (2) SetReqLen macros in include/X11/Xlibint.h in X11R6.x and libX11 before 1.6.0 allow remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted request, which triggers a buffer overflow.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-7439"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-04-16T14:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple off-by-one errors in the (1) MakeBigReq and (2) SetReqLen macros in include/X11/Xlibint.h in X11R6.x and libX11 before 1.6.0 allow remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted request, which triggers a buffer overflow.",
  "id": "GHSA-rq5m-5v65-q84q",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:47:55Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:47:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-7439"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56508"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2015-April/002561.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q2/81"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3224"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjul2015-2511963.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/73962"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2568-1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.