ghsa-rq5m-5v65-q84q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:47
Modified
2022-05-17 03:47
Details
Multiple off-by-one errors in the (1) MakeBigReq and (2) SetReqLen macros in include/X11/Xlibint.h in X11R6.x and libX11 before 1.6.0 allow remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted request, which triggers a buffer overflow.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2013-7439" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-04-16T14:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Multiple off-by-one errors in the (1) MakeBigReq and (2) SetReqLen macros in include/X11/Xlibint.h in X11R6.x and libX11 before 1.6.0 allow remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted request, which triggers a buffer overflow.", "id": "GHSA-rq5m-5v65-q84q", "modified": "2022-05-17T03:47:55Z", "published": "2022-05-17T03:47:55Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-7439" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56508" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2015-April/002561.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q2/81" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3224" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjul2015-2511963.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/73962" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2568-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.