GHSA-RM66-9GH4-4GP8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-12 20:54 – Updated: 2024-11-12 20:54
VLAI?
Summary
cggmp21 vulnerable to ambiguous challenge derivation
Details

Challenge derivation in non-interactive ZK proofs was ambiguous and that could lead to security vulnerability (however, it's unknown if it could be exploited).

Severity ?
2.7 (Low)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "cggmp21"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.4.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-327"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-11-12T20:54:58Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "Challenge derivation in non-interactive ZK proofs was ambiguous and that could lead to security vulnerability (however, it\u0027s unknown if it could be exploited).\n",
  "id": "GHSA-rm66-9gh4-4gp8",
  "modified": "2024-11-12T20:54:58Z",
  "published": "2024-11-12T20:54:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/dfns/cggmp21/pull/103"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/LFDT-Lockness/cggmp21"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2024-0393.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "cggmp21 vulnerable to ambiguous challenge derivation"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.