ghsa-rf4p-xq4w-3f34
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:13
Modified
2022-05-14 02:13
Details
The XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping hypercall in Xen 3.2.x through 4.5.x, when using a PCI passthrough device, is not preemptible, which allows local x86 HVM domain users to cause a denial of service (host CPU consumption) via a crafted request to the device model (qemu-dm).
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-2752" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-04-01T14:59:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping hypercall in Xen 3.2.x through 4.5.x, when using a PCI passthrough device, is not preemptible, which allows local x86 HVM domain users to cause a denial of service (host CPU consumption) via a crafted request to the device model (qemu-dm).", "id": "GHSA-rf4p-xq4w-3f34", "modified": "2022-05-14T02:13:58Z", "published": "2022-05-14T02:13:58Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-2752" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201504-04" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/154574.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/154579.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/155198.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-04/msg00014.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-05/msg00018.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/73448" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031994" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-125.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.