ghsa-rcjr-w794-6fgv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:52
Modified
2025-04-11 03:53
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in (1) view/admin/log_item.php and (2) view/admin/log_item_details.php in the Redirection plugin 2.2.9 for WordPress allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the Referer HTTP header in a request to a post that does not exist.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2011-4562" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-79" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2011-11-28T21:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in (1) view/admin/log_item.php and (2) view/admin/log_item_details.php in the Redirection plugin 2.2.9 for WordPress allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the Referer HTTP header in a request to a post that does not exist.", "id": "GHSA-rcjr-w794-6fgv", "modified": "2025-04-11T03:53:03Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:52:03Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-4562" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/70373" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://dotxed.net/2011/websicherheit/lazy-xss-wenn-statistiken-und-loggs-zur-gefahr-werden.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/76092" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.org/files/view/105573/wpredirection229-xss.txt" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?reponame=\u0026new=447262%40redirection\u0026old=421721%40redirection" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/46310" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/redirection/changelog" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/49985" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…