ghsa-rcfw-ggjf-vmfj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 23:52
Modified
2022-05-01 23:52
Details
Exiv2 0.16 allows user-assisted remote attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash) via a zero value in Nikon lens information in the metadata of an image, related to "pretty printing" and the RationalValue::toLong function.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2008-2696" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2008-06-13T19:41:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Exiv2 0.16 allows user-assisted remote attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash) via a zero value in Nikon lens information in the metadata of an image, related to \"pretty printing\" and the RationalValue::toLong function.", "id": "GHSA-rcfw-ggjf-vmfj", "modified": "2022-05-01T23:52:31Z", "published": "2022-05-01T23:52:31Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-2696" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/42885" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524715" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://dev.robotbattle.com/bugs/view.php?id=0000546" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-10/msg00012.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30519" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32273" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.exiv2.org/changelog.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2008:119" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29586" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-655-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1766/references" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.