ghsa-rc7m-hpcg-8c7c
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:27
Modified
2022-05-13 01:27
Details
The alert functionality in bitcoind and Bitcoin-Qt before 0.7.0 supports different character representations of the same signature data, but relies on a hash of this signature, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via a valid modified signature for a circulating alert.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2012-4684", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2013-03-12T11:28:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "The alert functionality in bitcoind and Bitcoin-Qt before 0.7.0 supports different character representations of the same signature data, but relies on a hash of this signature, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via a valid modified signature for a circulating alert.", id: "GHSA-rc7m-hpcg-8c7c", modified: "2022-05-13T01:27:54Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:27:54Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-4684", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=148109.0", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=8392.0", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/CVE-2012-4684", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/CVEs", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.