ghsa-r965-fhrj-6v64
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:09
Modified
2025-04-20 03:47
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
networking.c in Redis before 3.2.7 allows "Cross Protocol Scripting" because it lacks a check for POST and Host: strings, which are not valid in the Redis protocol (but commonly occur when an attack triggers an HTTP request to the Redis TCP port).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-10517"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-10-24T18:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "networking.c in Redis before 3.2.7 allows \"Cross Protocol Scripting\" because it lacks a check for POST and Host: strings, which are not valid in the Redis protocol (but commonly occur when an attack triggers an HTTP request to the Redis TCP port).",
"id": "GHSA-r965-fhrj-6v64",
"modified": "2025-04-20T03:47:34Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:09:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-10517"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101572"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…