ghsa-r8w7-3p4p-f22f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-12-16 18:31
Modified
2025-12-16 18:31
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
page_pool: always add GFP_NOWARN for ATOMIC allocations
Driver authors often forget to add GFP_NOWARN for page allocation from the datapath. This is annoying to users as OOMs are a fact of life, and we pretty much expect network Rx to hit page allocation failures during OOM. Make page pool add GFP_NOWARN for ATOMIC allocations by default.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-68321"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-16T16:16:11Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\npage_pool: always add GFP_NOWARN for ATOMIC allocations\n\nDriver authors often forget to add GFP_NOWARN for page allocation\nfrom the datapath. This is annoying to users as OOMs are a fact\nof life, and we pretty much expect network Rx to hit page allocation\nfailures during OOM. Make page pool add GFP_NOWARN for ATOMIC allocations\nby default.",
"id": "GHSA-r8w7-3p4p-f22f",
"modified": "2025-12-16T18:31:34Z",
"published": "2025-12-16T18:31:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68321"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ec2cd5c58793d0c622797cd5fbe26634b357210"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3671a0775952026228ae44e096eb144bca75f8dc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7613c06ffa89c1e2266fb532e23ef7dfdf269d73"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9835a0fd59a1df5ec0740fdab6d50db68e0f10de"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab48dc0e23eb714b3f233f8e8f6deed7df2051f5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f3b52167a0cb23b27414452fbc1278da2ee884fc"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…