ghsa-r7p5-qh2g-cp2f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 02:14
Modified
2025-04-03 04:18
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The mprotect code (mprotect.c) in Linux 2.6 on Itanium IA64 Montecito processors does not properly maintain cache coherency as required by the architecture, which allows local users to cause a denial of service and possibly corrupt data by modifying PTE protections.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-3105"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-09-30T10:05:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "The mprotect code (mprotect.c) in Linux 2.6 on Itanium IA64 Montecito processors does not properly maintain cache coherency as required by the architecture, which allows local users to cause a denial of service and possibly corrupt data by modifying PTE protections.",
"id": "GHSA-r7p5-qh2g-cp2f",
"modified": "2025-04-03T04:18:00Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:14:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-3105"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11283"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://cache-www.intel.com/cd/00/00/21/57/215792_215792.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/cset%404248d4019z8HvgrPAji51TKrWiV2uw?nav=index.html%7Csrc/%7Csrc/mm%7Crelated/mm/mprotect.c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/cset@4248d4019z8HvgrPAji51TKrWiV2uw?nav=index.html|src/|src/mm|related/mm/mprotect.c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18056"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-922"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.intel.com/cd/ids/developer/asmo-na/eng/215766.htm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-514.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…