ghsa-r7p5-qh2g-cp2f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 02:14
Modified
2022-05-01 02:14
Details

The mprotect code (mprotect.c) in Linux 2.6 on Itanium IA64 Montecito processors does not properly maintain cache coherency as required by the architecture, which allows local users to cause a denial of service and possibly corrupt data by modifying PTE protections.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-3105"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-09-30T10:05:00Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "The mprotect code (mprotect.c) in Linux 2.6 on Itanium IA64 Montecito processors does not properly maintain cache coherency as required by the architecture, which allows local users to cause a denial of service and possibly corrupt data by modifying PTE protections.",
  "id": "GHSA-r7p5-qh2g-cp2f",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T02:14:36Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T02:14:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-3105"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11283"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://cache-www.intel.com/cd/00/00/21/57/215792_215792.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/cset@4248d4019z8HvgrPAji51TKrWiV2uw?nav=index.html|src/|src/mm|related/mm/mprotect.c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18056"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-922"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.intel.com/cd/ids/developer/asmo-na/eng/215766.htm"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-514.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.