ghsa-r5h2-24x5-fv2h
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:43
Modified
2022-05-13 01:43
Severity ?
Details
In libavformat/rl2.c in FFmpeg 3.3.3, a DoS in rl2_read_header() due to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might cause huge CPU and memory consumption. When a crafted RL2 file, which claims a large "frame_count" field in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loops (for offset and size tables) would consume huge CPU and memory resources, since there is no EOF check inside these loops.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2017-14056", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-834", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2017-08-31T15:29:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "In libavformat/rl2.c in FFmpeg 3.3.3, a DoS in rl2_read_header() due to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might cause huge CPU and memory consumption. When a crafted RL2 file, which claims a large \"frame_count\" field in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loops (for offset and size tables) would consume huge CPU and memory resources, since there is no EOF check inside these loops.", id: "GHSA-r5h2-24x5-fv2h", modified: "2022-05-13T01:43:17Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:43:17Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-14056", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/96f24d1bee7fe7bac08e2b7c74db1a046c9dc0de", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/01/msg00006.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3996", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100628", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.