ghsa-r399-2ghf-qww5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:25
Modified
2022-05-03 03:25
Details
The ima_lsm_rule_init function in security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.37, when the Linux Security Modules (LSM) framework is disabled, allows local users to bypass Integrity Measurement Architecture (IMA) rules in opportunistic circumstances by leveraging an administrator's addition of an IMA rule for LSM.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2011-0006" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-06-21T23:55:00Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "The ima_lsm_rule_init function in security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.37, when the Linux Security Modules (LSM) framework is disabled, allows local users to bypass Integrity Measurement Architecture (IMA) rules in opportunistic circumstances by leveraging an administrator\u0027s addition of an IMA rule for LSM.", "id": "GHSA-r399-2ghf-qww5", "modified": "2022-05-03T03:25:08Z", "published": "2022-05-03T03:25:08Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-0006" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/867c20265459d30a01b021a9c1e81fb4c5832aa9" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667912" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.37" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=867c20265459d30a01b021a9c1e81fb4c5832aa9" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=867c20265459d30a01b021a9c1e81fb4c5832aa9" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/06/18" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.