ghsa-qvp7-wcjq-6rv5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:53
Modified
2022-05-14 03:53
Severity ?
Details
The TLS session cache in FreeRADIUS 2.1.1 through 2.1.7, 3.0.x before 3.0.14, 3.1.x before 2017-02-04, and 4.0.x before 2017-02-04 fails to reliably prevent resumption of an unauthenticated session, which allows remote attackers (such as malicious 802.1X supplicants) to bypass authentication via PEAP or TTLS.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2017-9148", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-287", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2017-05-29T17:29:00Z", severity: "CRITICAL", }, details: "The TLS session cache in FreeRADIUS 2.1.1 through 2.1.7, 3.0.x before 3.0.14, 3.1.x before 2017-02-04, and 4.0.x before 2017-02-04 fails to reliably prevent resumption of an unauthenticated session, which allows remote attackers (such as malicious 802.1X supplicants) to bypass authentication via PEAP or TTLS.", id: "GHSA-qvp7-wcjq-6rv5", modified: "2022-05-14T03:53:45Z", published: "2022-05-14T03:53:45Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9148", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1581", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201706-27", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://freeradius.org/security.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q2/422", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98734", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038576", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.