GHSA-QVJV-Q9PQ-QRXR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-09 03:31 – Updated: 2025-12-09 03:31
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
EDAC/i10nm: fix refcount leak in pci_get_dev_wrapper()
As the comment of pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() says, it returns a PCI device with refcount incremented, so it doesn't need to call an extra pci_dev_get() in pci_get_dev_wrapper(), and the PCI device needs to be put in the error path.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-50645"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-09T01:16:47Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nEDAC/i10nm: fix refcount leak in pci_get_dev_wrapper()\n\nAs the comment of pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() says, it returns\na PCI device with refcount incremented, so it doesn\u0027t need to\ncall an extra pci_dev_get() in pci_get_dev_wrapper(), and the PCI\ndevice needs to be put in the error path.",
"id": "GHSA-qvjv-q9pq-qrxr",
"modified": "2025-12-09T03:31:09Z",
"published": "2025-12-09T03:31:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-50645"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1adb2583cdbd75f379e3230a43a7412d373d499f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2db53c7059167b63cc790366ef1a9e286e71980b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3e255dc21031cc1f341584eb99a7f31598bf0be7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9c8921555907f4d723f01ed2d859b66f2d14f08e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e6e295a434d1c917a017980389aec88bf35cc81b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f29c2f57cdf7a57223dcd9fbaa2261faab5234b2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…