ghsa-qj48-g5ch-7g59
Vulnerability from github
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to avoid panic once fallocation fails for pinfile
syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below:
------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2746! CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5323 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-syzkaller-00018-g7cb1b4663150 #0 RIP: 0010:get_new_segment fs/f2fs/segment.c:2746 [inline] RIP: 0010:new_curseg+0x1f52/0x1f70 fs/f2fs/segment.c:2876 Call Trace: __allocate_new_segment+0x1ce/0x940 fs/f2fs/segment.c:3210 f2fs_allocate_new_section fs/f2fs/segment.c:3224 [inline] f2fs_allocate_pinning_section+0xfa/0x4e0 fs/f2fs/segment.c:3238 f2fs_expand_inode_data+0x696/0xca0 fs/f2fs/file.c:1830 f2fs_fallocate+0x537/0xa10 fs/f2fs/file.c:1940 vfs_fallocate+0x569/0x6e0 fs/open.c:327 do_vfs_ioctl+0x258c/0x2e40 fs/ioctl.c:885 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0x80/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Concurrent pinfile allocation may run out of free section, result in panic in get_new_segment(), let's expand pin_sem lock coverage to include f2fs_gc(), so that we can make sure to reclaim enough free space for following allocation.
In addition, do below changes to enhance error path handling: - call f2fs_bug_on() only in non-pinfile allocation path in get_new_segment(). - call reset_curseg_fields() to reset all fields of curseg in new_curseg()
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-23130"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-16T15:16:07Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nf2fs: fix to avoid panic once fallocation fails for pinfile\n\nsyzbot reports a f2fs bug as below:\n\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nkernel BUG at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2746!\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5323 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-syzkaller-00018-g7cb1b4663150 #0\nRIP: 0010:get_new_segment fs/f2fs/segment.c:2746 [inline]\nRIP: 0010:new_curseg+0x1f52/0x1f70 fs/f2fs/segment.c:2876\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n __allocate_new_segment+0x1ce/0x940 fs/f2fs/segment.c:3210\n f2fs_allocate_new_section fs/f2fs/segment.c:3224 [inline]\n f2fs_allocate_pinning_section+0xfa/0x4e0 fs/f2fs/segment.c:3238\n f2fs_expand_inode_data+0x696/0xca0 fs/f2fs/file.c:1830\n f2fs_fallocate+0x537/0xa10 fs/f2fs/file.c:1940\n vfs_fallocate+0x569/0x6e0 fs/open.c:327\n do_vfs_ioctl+0x258c/0x2e40 fs/ioctl.c:885\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl+0x80/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n\nConcurrent pinfile allocation may run out of free section, result in\npanic in get_new_segment(), let\u0027s expand pin_sem lock coverage to\ninclude f2fs_gc(), so that we can make sure to reclaim enough free\nspace for following allocation.\n\nIn addition, do below changes to enhance error path handling:\n- call f2fs_bug_on() only in non-pinfile allocation path in\nget_new_segment().\n- call reset_curseg_fields() to reset all fields of curseg in\nnew_curseg()",
"id": "GHSA-qj48-g5ch-7g59",
"modified": "2025-11-04T18:31:31Z",
"published": "2025-04-16T15:34:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-23130"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2dda0930fb79b847b4bfceb737577d0f6bc24d7d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/48ea8b200414ac69ea96f4c231f5c7ef1fbeffef"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9392862608d081a8346a3b841f862d732fce954b"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.