ghsa-qfxc-jf9x-mx8f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:21
Modified
2022-05-03 03:21
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in IBM DB2 9.1 before FP9, 9.5 before FP6, and 9.7 before FP2 allows remote authenticated users to have an unspecified impact via a SELECT statement that has a long column name generated with the REPEAT function.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-0462" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2010-01-28T20:30:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in IBM DB2 9.1 before FP9, 9.5 before FP6, and 9.7 before FP2 allows remote authenticated users to have an unspecified impact via a SELECT statement that has a long column name generated with the REPEAT function.", "id": "GHSA-qfxc-jf9x-mx8f", "modified": "2022-05-03T03:21:21Z", "published": "2022-05-03T03:21:21Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-0462" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/55899" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A14518" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://intevydis.blogspot.com/2010/01/ibm-db2-97-heap-overflow.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1023509" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC65922" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC65933" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC65935" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21426108" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21432298" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/37976" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.