ghsa-qfvv-4jjj-6cq2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:05
Modified
2022-05-14 02:05
Details
The (1) bundled GnuTLS SSL/TLS plugin and the (2) bundled OpenSSL SSL/TLS plugin in libpurple in Pidgin before 2.10.10 do not properly consider the Basic Constraints extension during verification of X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2014-3694" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2014-10-29T10:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The (1) bundled GnuTLS SSL/TLS plugin and the (2) bundled OpenSSL SSL/TLS plugin in libpurple in Pidgin before 2.10.10 do not properly consider the Basic Constraints extension during verification of X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.", "id": "GHSA-qfvv-4jjj-6cq2", "modified": "2022-05-14T02:05:20Z", "published": "2022-05-14T02:05:20Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-3694" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1854" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://hg.pidgin.im/pidgin/main/rev/2e4475087f04" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-11/msg00023.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-11/msg00037.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://pidgin.im/news/security/?id=86" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/60741" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/61968" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3055" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2390-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.