ghsa-qfv9-4gwp-p4m6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 00:09
Modified
2022-05-02 00:09
Details
The CGI modules in the server in Trend Micro OfficeScan 8.0 SP1 before build 2439 and 8.0 SP1 Patch 1 before build 3087 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and child process crash) via crafted HTTP headers, related to the "error handling mechanism."
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2008-4403", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2008-10-03T15:07:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "The CGI modules in the server in Trend Micro OfficeScan 8.0 SP1 before build 2439 and 8.0 SP1 Patch 1 before build 3087 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and child process crash) via crafted HTTP headers, related to the \"error handling mechanism.\"", id: "GHSA-qfv9-4gwp-p4m6", modified: "2022-05-02T00:09:43Z", published: "2022-05-02T00:09:43Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-4403", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/45599", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/32097", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/31531", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020974", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.trendmicro.com/ftp/documentation/readme/OSCE8.0_SP1_Patch1_CriticalPatch_3087_Readme.txt", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.trendmicro.com/ftp/documentation/readme/OSCE_8.0_SP1_Win_EN_CriticalPatch_B2439_Readme.txt", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2712", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.