ghsa-qfr5-wjpw-q4c4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-06-19 00:00
Modified
2022-06-29 21:52
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Summary
Denial of Service in python-ldap
Details
python-ldap before 3.4.0 is vulnerable to a denial of service when ldap.schema is used for untrusted schema definitions, because of a regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) flaw in the LDAP schema parser. By sending crafted regex input, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause a denial of service condition.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "python-ldap"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.4.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-46823"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1333"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-06-20T22:36:32Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-06-18T16:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "python-ldap before 3.4.0 is vulnerable to a denial of service when ldap.schema is used for untrusted schema definitions, because of a regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) flaw in the LDAP schema parser. By sending crafted regex input, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause a denial of service condition.",
"id": "GHSA-qfr5-wjpw-q4c4",
"modified": "2022-06-29T21:52:17Z",
"published": "2022-06-19T00:00:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/python-ldap/python-ldap/security/advisories/GHSA-r8wq-qrxc-hmcm"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-46823"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/221507"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/python-ldap/python-ldap"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Denial of Service in python-ldap"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…