ghsa-q8fq-52x5-p228
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-10-21 19:01
Modified
2023-01-21 03:30
Severity ?
Details
LibTIFF 4.4.0 has an out-of-bounds write in _TIFFmemset in libtiff/tif_unix.c:340 when called from processCropSelections, tools/tiffcrop.c:7619, allowing attackers to cause a denial-of-service via a crafted tiff file. For users that compile libtiff from sources, the fix is available with commit 236b7191.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2022-3626", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-787", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2022-10-21T16:15:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "LibTIFF 4.4.0 has an out-of-bounds write in _TIFFmemset in libtiff/tif_unix.c:340 when called from processCropSelections, tools/tiffcrop.c:7619, allowing attackers to cause a denial-of-service via a crafted tiff file. For users that compile libtiff from sources, the fix is available with commit 236b7191.", id: "GHSA-q8fq-52x5-p228", modified: "2023-01-21T03:30:28Z", published: "2022-10-21T19:01:14Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-3626", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/cves/-/blob/master/2022/CVE-2022-3626.json", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/commit/236b7191f04c60d09ee836ae13b50f812c841047", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/issues/426", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/01/msg00018.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230110-0001", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.