ghsa-q76v-gxg3-wx5g
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:58
Modified
2025-04-20 03:31
Severity ?
Details
named in ISC BIND 9.9.9-P4, 9.9.9-S6, 9.10.4-P4, and 9.11.0-P1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a response containing an inconsistency among the DNSSEC-related RRsets.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2016-9147", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-20", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2017-01-12T06:59:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "named in ISC BIND 9.9.9-P4, 9.9.9-S6, 9.10.4-P4, and 9.11.0-P1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a response containing an inconsistency among the DNSSEC-related RRsets.", id: "GHSA-q76v-gxg3-wx5g", modified: "2025-04-20T03:31:00Z", published: "2022-05-14T02:58:19Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-9147", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1582", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1583", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01440/74/CVE-2016-9147", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201708-01", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180926-0005", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0062.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0063.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0064.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3758", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95390", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037582", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.