ghsa-q6cq-m9gm-6q2f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-12-25 06:30
Modified
2024-10-23 18:34
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Summary
Slixmpp lacks SSL Certificate hostname validation in XMLStream
Details
Slixmpp before 1.8.3 lacks SSL Certificate hostname validation in XMLStream, allowing an attacker to pose as any server in the eyes of Slixmpp.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "slixmpp" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "1.8.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-45197" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-295" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2022-12-30T17:12:05Z", "nvd_published_at": "2022-12-25T05:15:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Slixmpp before 1.8.3 lacks SSL Certificate hostname validation in XMLStream, allowing an attacker to pose as any server in the eyes of Slixmpp.", "id": "GHSA-q6cq-m9gm-6q2f", "modified": "2024-10-23T18:34:22Z", "published": "2022-12-25T06:30:20Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-45197" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/poezio/slixmpp" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/poezio/slixmpp/commits/master/slixmpp/xmlstream/xmlstream.py" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/poezio/slixmpp/tags" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/slixmpp/PYSEC-2022-43013.yaml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lab.louiz.org/poezio/slixmpp/-/commit/b60b1b985db928532f97c4f61d6fbc801f0aa7fa" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lab.louiz.org/poezio/slixmpp/-/commits/master" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202305-07" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Slixmpp lacks SSL Certificate hostname validation in XMLStream" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…