ghsa-q3cf-46pw-53qv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:12
Modified
2022-05-13 01:12
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In libavformat/nsvdec.c in FFmpeg 2.4 and 3.3.3, a DoS in nsv_parse_NSVf_header() due to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might cause huge CPU consumption. When a crafted NSV file, which claims a large "table_entries_used" field in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loop over 'table_entries_used' would consume huge CPU resources, since there is no EOF check inside the loop.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-14171" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-834" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-09-07T06:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "In libavformat/nsvdec.c in FFmpeg 2.4 and 3.3.3, a DoS in nsv_parse_NSVf_header() due to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might cause huge CPU consumption. When a crafted NSV file, which claims a large \"table_entries_used\" field in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loop over \u0027table_entries_used\u0027 would consume huge CPU resources, since there is no EOF check inside the loop.", "id": "GHSA-q3cf-46pw-53qv", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:12:14Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:12:14Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-14171" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/c24bcb553650b91e9eff15ef6e54ca73de2453b7" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/01/msg00006.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3996" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100706" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…