ghsa-pw69-whjp-72c8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:46
Modified
2025-04-11 03:58
Details

Integer overflow in filter/source/msfilter/msdffimp.cxx in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 3.3, 3.4 Beta, and possibly earlier, and LibreOffice before 3.5.3, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via the length of an Escher graphics record in a PowerPoint (.ppt) document, which triggers a buffer overflow.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2012-2334"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-06-19T20:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Integer overflow in filter/source/msfilter/msdffimp.cxx in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 3.3, 3.4 Beta, and possibly earlier, and LibreOffice before 3.5.3, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via the length of an Escher graphics record in a PowerPoint (.ppt) document, which triggers a buffer overflow.",
  "id": "GHSA-pw69-whjp-72c8",
  "modified": "2025-04-11T03:58:35Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:46:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2334"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:0705"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-2334"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821803"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/75695"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-05/0091.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=28a6558f9d3ca2dda3191f8b5b3f2378ee2533da"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=512401decb286ba0fc3031939b8f7de8649c502e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-June/082168.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0705.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/46992"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/47244"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/49373"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/49392"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/60799"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1027070"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2487"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-201408-19.xml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.libreoffice.org/advisories/cve-2012-2334"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:090"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:091"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2012-2334.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/28/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/82517"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/53570"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.