ghsa-pvmm-7c2r-wmp4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-10-15 21:31
Modified
2025-10-15 21:31
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
A data corruption vulnerability has been identified in the luksmeta utility when used with the LUKS1 disk encryption format. An attacker with the necessary permissions can exploit this flaw by writing a large amount of metadata to an encrypted device. The utility fails to correctly validate the available space, causing the metadata to overwrite and corrupt the user's encrypted data. This action leads to a permanent loss of the stored information. Devices using the LUKS formats other than LUKS1 are not affected by this issue.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2025-11568" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-1284" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-10-15T20:15:34Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "A data corruption vulnerability has been identified in the luksmeta utility when used with the LUKS1 disk encryption format. An attacker with the necessary permissions can exploit this flaw by writing a large amount of metadata to an encrypted device. The utility fails to correctly validate the available space, causing the metadata to overwrite and corrupt the user\u0027s encrypted data. This action leads to a permanent loss of the stored information. Devices using the LUKS formats other than LUKS1 are not affected by this issue.", "id": "GHSA-pvmm-7c2r-wmp4", "modified": "2025-10-15T21:31:40Z", "published": "2025-10-15T21:31:40Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-11568" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11568" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2404244" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…