ghsa-pq7c-3frg-72hg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:20
Modified
2022-05-03 03:20
Details
IBM DB2 8 before FP18, 9.1 before FP8, 9.5 before FP4, and 9.7 before FP2 does not perform the expected drops of certain table functions upon a loss of privileges by the functions' definers, which has unspecified impact and remote attack vectors.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2009-3471" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2009-09-29T21:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "IBM DB2 8 before FP18, 9.1 before FP8, 9.5 before FP4, and 9.7 before FP2 does not perform the expected drops of certain table functions upon a loss of privileges by the functions\u0027 definers, which has unspecified impact and remote attack vectors.", "id": "GHSA-pq7c-3frg-72hg", "modified": "2022-05-03T03:20:29Z", "published": "2022-05-03T03:20:29Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-3471" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/58477" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36890" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC63548" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IZ46658" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IZ46773" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IZ46774" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21386689" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21403619" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21426108" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21432298" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36540" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.