ghsa-pj3v-4mjw-vvpv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:35
Modified
2022-05-14 03:35
Details
Multiple integer signedness errors in the (1) process_bin_sasl_auth, (2) process_bin_complete_sasl_auth, (3) process_bin_update, and (4) process_bin_append_prepend functions in Memcached 1.4.5 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a large body length value in a packet.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2011-4971", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2013-12-12T18:55:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "Multiple integer signedness errors in the (1) process_bin_sasl_auth, (2) process_bin_complete_sasl_auth, (3) process_bin_update, and (4) process_bin_append_prepend functions in Memcached 1.4.5 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a large body length value in a packet.", id: "GHSA-pj3v-4mjw-vvpv", modified: "2022-05-14T03:35:51Z", published: "2022-05-14T03:35:51Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-4971", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=192", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://puppet.com/security/cve/cve-2011-4971", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://insecurety.net/?p=872", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/56183", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-2832", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:280", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/59567", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2080-1", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.