ghsa-pcqc-c89r-492h
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-02-26 18:30
Modified
2024-04-17 21:30
Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
crypto: rsa - add a check for allocation failure
Static checkers insist that the mpi_alloc() allocation can fail so add a check to prevent a NULL dereference. Small allocations like this can't actually fail in current kernels, but adding a check is very simple and makes the static checkers happy.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2023-52472", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-476", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2024-02-26T16:27:48Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncrypto: rsa - add a check for allocation failure\n\nStatic checkers insist that the mpi_alloc() allocation can fail so add\na check to prevent a NULL dereference. Small allocations like this\ncan't actually fail in current kernels, but adding a check is very\nsimple and makes the static checkers happy.", id: "GHSA-pcqc-c89r-492h", modified: "2024-04-17T21:30:45Z", published: "2024-02-26T18:30:29Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52472", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2831f4d3bfa68e64c5f83e96688be779c87b3511", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/95ad8b6879e2e49d02e3bfc0e1fb46421633fe2a", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d872ca165cb67112f2841ef9c37d51ef7e63d1e4", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.