ghsa-p887-wgc2-jm3q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 01:27
Modified
2022-04-29 01:27
Details

Sambar Server before 6.0 beta 3 allows attackers with physical access to execute arbitrary code via a request with an MS-DOS device name such as com1.pl, con.pl, or aux.pl, which causes Perl to read the code from the associated device.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2003-1287"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2003-12-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Sambar Server before 6.0 beta 3 allows attackers with physical access to execute arbitrary code via a request with an MS-DOS device name such as com1.pl, con.pl, or aux.pl, which causes Perl to read the code from the associated device.",
  "id": "GHSA-p887-wgc2-jm3q",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T01:27:49Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T01:27:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-1287"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16059"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2004-04/0353.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/9578"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1007819"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=103\u0026type=vulnerabilities\u0026flashstatus=true"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/5781"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.sambar.com/security.htm"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…