ghsa-p5jc-gpgq-6vfg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 06:58
Modified
2025-04-03 04:32
Details

RealVNC 4.1.1, and other products that use RealVNC such as AdderLink IP and Cisco CallManager, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a request in which the client specifies an insecure security type such as "Type 1 - None", which is accepted even if it is not offered by the server, as originally demonstrated using a long password.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-2369"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-05-15T16:06:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "RealVNC 4.1.1, and other products that use RealVNC such as AdderLink IP and Cisco CallManager, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a request in which the client specifies an insecure security type such as \"Type 1 - None\", which is accepted even if it is not offered by the server, as originally demonstrated using a long password.",
  "id": "GHSA-p5jc-gpgq-6vfg",
  "modified": "2025-04-03T04:32:32Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T06:58:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-2369"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26445"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=full-disclosure\u0026m=114768344111131\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=vnc-list\u0026m=114755444130188\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/29"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20107"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20109"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20789"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8355"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016083"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sr-20060622-cmm.shtml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/security-flaw-in-realvnc-411.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/05/vnc-flaw-proof-of-concept.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/117929"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/08/02/8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/25479"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.realvnc.com/products/free/4.1/release-notes.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/433994/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434015/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434117/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434518/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434560/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438175/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438368/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17978"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1790"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1821"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2492"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…