ghsa-mr6x-qh8f-pvw6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 06:40
Modified
2025-04-03 04:25
Details

Buffer overflow in git-checkout-index in GIT before 1.1.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an index file with a long symbolic link.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2006-0477",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2006-01-31T11:03:00Z",
      severity: "HIGH",
   },
   details: "Buffer overflow in git-checkout-index in GIT before 1.1.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an index file with a long symbolic link.",
   id: "GHSA-mr6x-qh8f-pvw6",
   modified: "2025-04-03T04:25:52Z",
   published: "2022-05-01T06:40:18Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-0477",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24360",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lwn.net/Articles/169623",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/18643",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16417",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0367",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.