ghsa-mqr3-725g-5qgw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:01
Modified
2022-05-17 02:01
Details
avahi-core/socket.c in avahi-daemon in Avahi before 0.6.29 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via an empty mDNS (1) IPv4 or (2) IPv6 UDP packet to port 5353. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2010-2244.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2011-1002" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-835" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2011-02-22T19:00:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "avahi-core/socket.c in avahi-daemon in Avahi before 0.6.29 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via an empty mDNS (1) IPv4 or (2) IPv6 UDP packet to port 5353. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2010-2244.", "id": "GHSA-mqr3-725g-5qgw", "modified": "2022-05-17T02:01:31Z", "published": "2022-05-17T02:01:31Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-1002" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011:0436" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011:0779" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2011-1002" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667187" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/65524" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/65525" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://avahi.org/ticket/325" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.0pointer.de/?p=avahi.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=46109dfec75534fe270c0ab902576f685d5ab3a6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.0pointer.de/?p=avahi.git;a=commit;h=46109dfec75534fe270c0ab902576f685d5ab3a6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-March/055858.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-04/msg00000.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/18/1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/18/4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/70948" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/43361" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/43465" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/43605" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/43673" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/44131" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://ubuntu.com/usn/usn-1084-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2174" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:037" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:040" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/22/9" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0436.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0779.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46446" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0448" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0499" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0511" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0565" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0601" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0670" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0969" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://xorl.wordpress.com/2011/02/20/cve-2011-1002-avahi-daemon-remote-denial-of-service" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.