ghsa-mqj4-x9gm-m5r5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:44
Modified
2022-05-13 01:44
Severity ?
Details
The daemon in rsync 3.1.2, and 3.1.3-development before 2017-12-03, does not check for fnamecmp filenames in the daemon_filter_list data structure (in the recv_files function in receiver.c) and also does not apply the sanitize_paths protection mechanism to pathnames found in "xname follows" strings (in the read_ndx_and_attrs function in rsync.c), which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-17434" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-12-06T03:29:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "The daemon in rsync 3.1.2, and 3.1.3-development before 2017-12-03, does not check for fnamecmp filenames in the daemon_filter_list data structure (in the recv_files function in receiver.c) and also does not apply the sanitize_paths protection mechanism to pathnames found in \"xname follows\" strings (in the read_ndx_and_attrs function in rsync.c), which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions.", "id": "GHSA-mqj4-x9gm-m5r5", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:44:24Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:44:24Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-17434" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=commit;h=5509597decdbd7b91994210f700329d8a35e70a1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=commit;h=70aeb5fddd1b2f8e143276f8d5a085db16c593b9" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00020.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4068" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security.cucumberlinux.com/security/details.php?id=170" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.