ghsa-mp6x-6v97-mg8p
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 18:29
Modified
2022-05-01 18:29
Details

Heap-based buffer overflow in iaspam.dll in the SMTP Server in Ipswitch IMail Server 8.01 through 8.11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a set of four different e-mail messages with a long boundary parameter in a certain malformed Content-Type header line, the string "MIME" by itself on a line in the header, and a long Content-Transfer-Encoding header line.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-5094"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-09-26T22:17:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in iaspam.dll in the SMTP Server in Ipswitch IMail Server 8.01 through 8.11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a set of four different e-mail messages with a long boundary parameter in a certain malformed Content-Type header line, the string \"MIME\" by itself on a line in the header, and a long Content-Transfer-Encoding header line.",
  "id": "GHSA-mp6x-6v97-mg8p",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T18:29:53Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T18:29:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-5094"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/36723"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/4438"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/39390"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://pstgroup.blogspot.com/2007/09/exploitimail-iaspamdll-80x-remote-heap.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25762"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…