ghsa-mmrq-6999-72v8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:50
Modified
2023-07-24 20:06
Severity ?
Summary
Ruby Openssl Allows Incorrect Value Comparison
Details
An issue was discovered in the OpenSSL library in Ruby when two OpenSSL::X509::Name
objects are compared using ==
, depending on the ordering, non-equal objects may return true. When the first argument is one character longer than the second, or the second argument contains a character that is one less than a character in the same position of the first argument, the result of ==
will be true. This could be leveraged to create an illegitimate certificate that may be accepted as legitimate and then used in signing or encryption operations.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "RubyGems", "name": "openssl" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "2.0.9" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "RubyGems", "name": "openssl" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "2.1.0" }, { "fixed": "2.1.2" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-16395" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2023-06-09T22:57:50Z", "nvd_published_at": "2018-11-16T18:29:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "An issue was discovered in the OpenSSL library in Ruby when two `OpenSSL::X509::Name` objects are compared using `==`, depending on the ordering, non-equal objects may return true. When the first argument is one character longer than the second, or the second argument contains a character that is one less than a character in the same position of the first argument, the result of `==` will be true. This could be leveraged to create an illegitimate certificate that may be accepted as legitimate and then used in signing or encryption operations.", "id": "GHSA-mmrq-6999-72v8", "modified": "2023-07-24T20:06:51Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:50:20Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-16395" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/ruby/openssl/commit/f653cfa43f0f20e8c440122ea982382b6228e7f5" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/387250" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/11/06/ruby-2-6-0-preview3-released" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/10/17/ruby-2-5-2-released" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/10/17/ruby-2-4-5-released" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/10/17/ruby-2-3-8-released" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/10/17/openssl-x509-name-equality-check-does-not-work-correctly-cve-2018-16395" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4332" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20211206015239/https://securitytracker.com/id/1042105" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3808-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190221-0002" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/10/msg00020.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/openssl/CVE-2018-16395.yml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2565" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1948" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3738" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Ruby Openssl Allows Incorrect Value Comparison" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.