ghsa-mh9j-g427-6h4w
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:12
Modified
2022-05-17 03:12
Details
The slapi-nis plug-in before 0.54.2 does not properly reallocate memory when processing user accounts, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and CPU consumption) via a request for a (1) group with a large number of members or (2) user that belongs to a large number of groups.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-0283" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-03-30T14:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The slapi-nis plug-in before 0.54.2 does not properly reallocate memory when processing user accounts, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and CPU consumption) via a request for a (1) group with a large number of members or (2) user that belongs to a large number of groups.", "id": "GHSA-mh9j-g427-6h4w", "modified": "2022-05-17T03:12:32Z", "published": "2022-05-17T03:12:32Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-0283" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:0728" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0283" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195729" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/slapi-nis.git/commit/?id=6573f91c95f7a353ad3bdf2fe95b0c15932aa097" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/154314.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/154103.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0728.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/73377" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.