ghsa-mf8j-4w89-w4fp
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:01
Modified
2022-05-14 02:01
Severity ?
Details
A stack buffer overflow in NumberingSystem in International Components for Unicode (ICU) for C/C++ before 60.2, as used in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 62.0.3202.75 and other products, allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2017-15396", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-119", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2018-08-28T20:29:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "A stack buffer overflow in NumberingSystem in International Components for Unicode (ICU) for C/C++ before 60.2, as used in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 62.0.3202.75 and other products, allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page.", id: "GHSA-mf8j-4w89-w4fp", modified: "2022-05-14T02:01:21Z", published: "2022-05-14T02:01:21Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-15396", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3082", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2017/10/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_26.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://crbug.com/770452", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201711-02", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4020", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://bugs.icu-project.org/trac/changeset/40494", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101597", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.