ghsa-mc88-pmhf-w5pc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:11
Modified
2022-05-13 01:11
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Multiple buffer overflows in demo programs in FreeType before 2.4.0 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted font file.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-2527"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-120"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-08-19T18:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple buffer overflows in demo programs in FreeType before 2.4.0 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted font file.",
"id": "GHSA-mc88-pmhf-w5pc",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:11:16Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:11:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-2527"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614557"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2-demos.git/commit/?id=b995299b73ba4cd259f221f500d4e63095508bec"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/freetype/2010-07/msg00001.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127912955808467\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?30054"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48951"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1024266"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2070"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0577.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0578.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-963-1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…