ghsa-m87g-gjm6-7c8j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-07-30 09:32
Modified
2024-12-11 15:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/mlx5: E-switch, Create ingress ACL when needed

Currently, ingress acl is used for three features. It is created only when vport metadata match and prio tag are enabled. But active-backup lag mode also uses it. It is independent of vport metadata match and prio tag. And vport metadata match can be disabled using the following devlink command:

# devlink dev param set pci/0000:08:00.0 name esw_port_metadata \ value false cmode runtime

If ingress acl is not created, will hit panic when creating drop rule for active-backup lag mode. If always create it, there will be about 5% performance degradation.

Fix it by creating ingress acl when needed. If esw_port_metadata is true, ingress acl exists, then create drop rule using existing ingress acl. If esw_port_metadata is false, create ingress acl and then create drop rule.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2024-42142",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2024-07-30T08:15:05Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/mlx5: E-switch, Create ingress ACL when needed\n\nCurrently, ingress acl is used for three features. It is created only\nwhen vport metadata match and prio tag are enabled. But active-backup\nlag mode also uses it. It is independent of vport metadata match and\nprio tag. And vport metadata match can be disabled using the\nfollowing devlink command:\n\n # devlink dev param set pci/0000:08:00.0 name esw_port_metadata \\\n\tvalue false cmode runtime\n\nIf ingress acl is not created, will hit panic when creating drop rule\nfor active-backup lag mode. If always create it, there will be about\n5% performance degradation.\n\nFix it by creating ingress acl when needed. If esw_port_metadata is\ntrue, ingress acl exists, then create drop rule using existing\ningress acl. If esw_port_metadata is false, create ingress acl and\nthen create drop rule.",
   id: "GHSA-m87g-gjm6-7c8j",
   modified: "2024-12-11T15:31:15Z",
   published: "2024-07-30T09:32:02Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42142",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3e3551f8702978cd2221d2614ca6d6727e785324",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83bc1a129f7fd0d7d05036ceb7ee69102624e320",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b20c2fb45470d0c7a603613c9cfa5d45720e17f2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bc3ff8d3c05044de57865ebbb78cca8f7da3e595",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.