ghsa-m37c-h529-2gqw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:39
Modified
2025-04-11 04:04
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in the linetoken function in afmparse.c in t1lib, as used in teTeX 3.0.x, GNOME evince, and possibly other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a DVI file containing a crafted Adobe Font Metrics (AFM) file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-2642.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-0433"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-11-19T12:10:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the linetoken function in afmparse.c in t1lib, as used in teTeX 3.0.x, GNOME evince, and possibly other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a DVI file containing a crafted Adobe Font Metrics (AFM) file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-2642.",
"id": "GHSA-m37c-h529-2gqw",
"modified": "2025-04-11T04:04:58Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:39:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-0433"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=640923"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679732"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-57"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1201.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48985"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:144"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://xorl.wordpress.com/2011/02/20/cve-2011-0433-evince-linetoken-buffer-overflow"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…