ghsa-jrmm-8whf-pxxq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-04-02 15:31
Modified
2025-04-10 15:31
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: fix missing .is_two_pixels_per_container
Starting from 6.11, AMDGPU driver, while being loaded with amdgpu.dc=1, due to lack of .is_two_pixels_per_container function in dce60_tg_funcs, causes a NULL pointer dereference on PCs with old GPUs, such as R9 280X.
So this fix adds missing .is_two_pixels_per_container to dce60_tg_funcs.
(cherry picked from commit bd4b125eb949785c6f8a53b0494e32795421209d)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-21989"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-476"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-02T13:15:43Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: fix missing .is_two_pixels_per_container\n\nStarting from 6.11, AMDGPU driver, while being loaded with amdgpu.dc=1,\ndue to lack of .is_two_pixels_per_container function in dce60_tg_funcs,\ncauses a NULL pointer dereference on PCs with old GPUs, such as R9 280X.\n\nSo this fix adds missing .is_two_pixels_per_container to dce60_tg_funcs.\n\n(cherry picked from commit bd4b125eb949785c6f8a53b0494e32795421209d)",
"id": "GHSA-jrmm-8whf-pxxq",
"modified": "2025-04-10T15:31:45Z",
"published": "2025-04-02T15:31:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21989"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/36d04c9313d8d83ead92242f037099ac73e02120"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e204aab79e01bc8ff750645666993ed8b719de57"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fefa811e616b5d0b555ed65743e528a0a8a0b377"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…