ghsa-jqv5-7xpx-qj74
Vulnerability from github
Published
2023-03-13 20:00
Modified
2023-03-16 21:34
Severity ?
8.1 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
sqlite vulnerable to code execution due to Object coercion
Details

Impact

Due to the underlying implementation of .ToString(), it's possible to execute arbitrary JavaScript, or to achieve a denial-of-service, if a binding parameter is a crafted Object.

Users of sqlite3 v5.0.0 - v5.1.4 are affected by this.

Patches

Fixed in v5.1.5. All users are recommended to upgrade to v5.1.5 or later.

Workarounds

  • Ensure there is sufficient sanitization in the parent application to protect against invalid values being supplied to binding parameters.

References

  • Commit: https://github.com/TryGhost/node-sqlite3/commit/edb1934dd222ae55632e120d8f64552d5191c781

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Credits: Dave McDaniel of Cisco Talos

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "sqlite3"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "5.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.1.5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-43441"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-913",
      "CWE-915"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-03-13T20:00:52Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-03-16T21:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nDue to the underlying implementation of `.ToString()`, it\u0027s possible to execute arbitrary JavaScript, or to achieve a denial-of-service, if a binding parameter is a crafted Object.\n\nUsers of `sqlite3` v5.0.0 - v5.1.4 are affected by this.\n\n### Patches\n\nFixed in v5.1.5. All users are recommended to upgrade to v5.1.5 or later.\n\n### Workarounds\n\n* Ensure there is sufficient sanitization in the parent application to protect against invalid values being supplied to binding parameters.\n\n### References\n\n* Commit: https://github.com/TryGhost/node-sqlite3/commit/edb1934dd222ae55632e120d8f64552d5191c781\n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\n* Email us at [security@ghost.org](mailto:security@ghost.org)\n\nCredits: Dave McDaniel of Cisco Talos",
  "id": "GHSA-jqv5-7xpx-qj74",
  "modified": "2023-03-16T21:34:27Z",
  "published": "2023-03-13T20:00:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/node-sqlite3/security/advisories/GHSA-jqv5-7xpx-qj74"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-43441"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/node-sqlite3/commit/edb1934dd222ae55632e120d8f64552d5191c781"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/TryGhost/node-sqlite3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2022-1645"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "sqlite vulnerable to code execution due to Object coercion"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.