ghsa-jqgc-m9mv-xqwm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:47
Modified
2022-05-24 17:47
Details

There is a integer overflow in media_tools/av_parsers.c in the gf_avc_read_pps_bs_internal in GPAC 1.0.1. pps_id may be a negative number, so it will not return. However, avc->pps only has 255 unit, so there is an overflow, which results a crash.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2021-30022",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-190",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2021-04-19T20:15:00Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "There is a integer overflow in media_tools/av_parsers.c in the gf_avc_read_pps_bs_internal in GPAC 1.0.1. pps_id may be a negative number, so it will not return. However, avc->pps only has 255 unit, so there is an overflow, which results a crash.",
   id: "GHSA-jqgc-m9mv-xqwm",
   modified: "2022-05-24T17:47:50Z",
   published: "2022-05-24T17:47:50Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-30022",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/gpac/gpac/issues/1720",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/gpac/gpac/commit/51cdb67ff7c5f1242ac58c5aa603ceaf1793b788",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.