ghsa-jq5h-388q-3jvj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-04 00:27
Modified
2022-05-04 00:27
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The em_syscall function in arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c in the KVM implementation in the Linux kernel before 3.2.14 does not properly handle the 0f05 (aka syscall) opcode, which allows guest OS users to cause a denial of service (guest OS crash) via a crafted application, as demonstrated by an NASM file.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-0045"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-07-03T16:40:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The em_syscall function in arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c in the KVM implementation in the Linux kernel before 3.2.14 does not properly handle the 0f05 (aka syscall) opcode, which allows guest OS users to cause a denial of service (guest OS crash) via a crafted application, as demonstrated by an NASM file.",
"id": "GHSA-jq5h-388q-3jvj",
"modified": "2022-05-04T00:27:48Z",
"published": "2022-05-04T00:27:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-0045"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/c2226fc9e87ba3da060e47333657cd6616652b84"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773370"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=c2226fc9e87ba3da060e47333657cd6616652b84"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=c2226fc9e87ba3da060e47333657cd6616652b84"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-05/msg00013.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.2.14"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/01/12/2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…